4.7 Article

Survivin silencing improved the cytotoxicity of carboplatin and melphalan in Y79 and primary retinoblastoma cells

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119824

关键词

Cationic switchable lipid; Survivin targeting siRNA; Switchable lipid nanoparticles; Retinoblastoma; Cancer

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [CHIR 426236]
  2. National Science and Engineering Science Council of Canada [408046-2012-RGPIN, RGPIN-2018-05682]
  3. Mitacs Inc. (Mitacs Globalink Graduate Fellowship Award) [GLF407]
  4. Vision Health Research Network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Survivin stands out as one of the most specific cancer targets discovered to date. Although single inhibition, e.g. through small interfering RNA (siRNA), has shown modest results in clinical trials, its combination with drugs holds promise to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapeutics. In this study, we propose a sequential treatment of siRNA survivin followed by chemotherapy. Firstly, we demonstrated that siRNA-loaded switchable lipid nano particles (siLNP) silence survivin in a panel of cancer cell lines. Subsequently, we selected retinoblastoma (RB) as our model to screen four chemotherapeutic agents: carboplatin, topotecan, melphalan or teniposide. The effect of drugs on survivin expression and caspase-3 was investigated by RT-qPCR. The best drug combination was selected measuring the viability, survivin expression and the selectivity of the treatment. Our stepwise method revealed that siRNA delivery by switchable LNP sensitized Y79, but not the healthy APRE-19 cell line, to carboplatin and melphalan cytotoxicity. This ability was validated on primary human RB cells. Finally, the distinct behavior of the drugs demonstrated that a diligent screening of drugs should be envisioned when looking for synergy with survivin. Our sequential approach highlighted carboplatin and melphalan as agents to be investigated in future survivin-associated in vivo testing to tackle RB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据