4.7 Article

Movement-Based Incentive for Crowdsourcing

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 66, 期 8, 页码 7223-7233

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2017.2654355

关键词

Auction theory; crowdsourcing; incentive mechanism design; mobility control

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CNS-1421578]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61471236, 61420106008, 61671295]
  3. 111 Project [B07022]
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Media Processing
  5. Shanghai Pujiang Program [16PJD029]
  6. Division Of Undergraduate Education
  7. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1259283] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of the research on the incentive mechanism design in crowdsourcing has focused on how to allocate sensing tasks to participants to maximize the social welfare. However, none of them consider the coverage holes created by the uneven distribution of participants. As a result, most of the participants in some popular areas compete for tasks, while many tasks in unpopular areas cannot be completed due to the lack of participants. In this paper, we design a movement-based incentive mechanism for crowdsourcing, where participants are stimulated to move to the unpopular areas and complete the sensing tasks in these areas, which benefits both participants and the platform. We formulate a task allocation problem considering controlled mobility. Since the task allocation problem is NP-hard, we propose a greedy algorithm to solve it and design a critical payment policy to guarantee that participants declare their cost truthfully. Theoretical analysis shows that our proposed incentive mechanism satisfies the desired properties of truthfulness, individual rationality, platform profitability, and computational efficiency. Evaluation results show that the proposed movement-based incentive mechanism outperforms the existing solution under various conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据