3.9 Article

Pterygium Surgery Utilizing Limbal Conjunctival Autograft and Subconjunctival Amniotic Membrane Graft in High-Risk Populations

期刊

CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 2087-2090

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S243584

关键词

pterygium; autograft; amniotic graft; technique; recurrence; cornea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To measure the outcomes of primary pterygium excision with a limbal conjunctival autograft when combined with the adjunctive use of a prophylactic subconjunctival graft of amniotic membrane to decrease the recurrence rate after surgery in an ethnically diverse population with a statistically higher risk for recurrence (African American, Asian, Caribbean, Asian, Latin). Design: This is a retrospective, non-comparative study of post-operative outcomes. Participants: A total of 355 patients, totaling 493 eyes, with clinically significant, primary pterygia. Patients and Methods: Patients were enrolled into the study based on the need for pterygium surgery and if they underwent primary pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft with subconjunctival amniotic membrane placement. Patients with recurrent pterygium or those with pseudopterygium were excluded from this study. All surgeries took place at the Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute (Boynton Beach, FL) between June 2006 and October 2013 by a single surgeon (BAS). Patients were seen on post-operative day 1, 7, 30, 90, 180 and 365 to evaluate for pterygium recurrence. Pterygium recurrence is defined in this study as growth greater than 1 mm past the corneal limbus at or after 6 months. Results: There were six cases of recurrent pterygium for a recurrence rate of 1.22%+/- 0.97% (n=493, p=0.05). Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 6 years (mean 28 months). Conclusion: Primary pterygium excision with a limbal conjunctival autograft and placement of a subconjunctival amniotic membrane graft has a low recurrence rate consistent with previously published data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据