4.8 Article

Analysing the potential of citizen-financed community renewable energy to drive Europe's low-carbon energy transition

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110300

关键词

Community renewable energy; Social potential; Energy transition; Citizen finance; Survey-based social simulation

资金

  1. European Union [727470]
  2. project MISTRAL under Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [813837]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [813837] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  4. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [727470] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2018, the real amount invested in the European Union's energy transition fell short of the funding level required to reach the 2030 climate and energy targets by 179 billion. Citizen-led finance in renewable energy development emerges as an innovative tool to bridge this investment gap. However, in spite of the European Union's ambition to involve local communities for co-driving the low-carbon energy transition, there is no comprehensive analysis quantifying citizens' potential to co-finance and participate in community renewable energy initiatives across Europe. We address this knowledge gap through a representative choice experiment survey that collected responses from 16,235 participants to different hypothetical investment options on renewable energy schemes across all European Union Member States, and estimate the social potential of European citizens to participate and invest in community-administered wind farms. Results from a novel surveybased social simulation indicate that 176 billion could be obtained from citizen-led finance in community-administered wind farm developments, enough to halve the investment gap to achieve a 32% renewable energy share in final energy consumption by 2030. Our analysis substantiates the case for facilitating easily accessible, risk-insured community investment options across Europe to unlock citizens' social potential for investing in community renewable energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据