4.4 Article

Oral chronic graft-versus-host disease What the general dental practitioner needs to know

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
卷 151, 期 11, 页码 846-856

出版社

AMER DENTAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.08.001

关键词

Oral graft-versus-host-disease; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; oral care; dental treatment; xerostomia; hyposalivation; caries; oral candidiasis; trismus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Long-term survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation will increasingly seek care from dental providers. Methods. The authors highlight the importance of minimizing oral symptoms and complications associated with oral chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD). Results. Chronic GVHD is the result of an immune response of donor-derived cells against recipient tissues. Oral cGVHD can affect the mucosa and damage salivary glands and cause sclerotic changes. Symptoms include sensitivity and pain, dry mouth, taste changes, and limited mouth opening. Risk of developing caries and oral cancer is increased. Food intake, oral hygiene, and dental interventions can represent challenges. Oral cGVHD manifestations and dental interventions should be managed in close consultation with the medical team, as systemic treatment for cGVHD can have implications for dental management. Conclusions. General dental practitioners can contribute substantially to alleviating oral cGVHD involvement and preventing additional oral health deterioration. Practical Implications. Frequent examinations, patient education, oral hygiene reinforcement, dry mouth management, caries prevention, and management of dental needs are indicated. In addition, oral physical therapy might be needed. Invasive dental interventions should be coordinated with the transplantation team. Screening for oral malignancies is important even years after resolution of GVHD symptoms. Management of the oral manifestations of cGVHD might require referral to an oral medicine professional.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据