4.6 Article

Tuning the mechanical and electronic properties and carrier mobility of phosphorene via family atom doping: a first-principles study

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 8, 期 42, 页码 14902-14909

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc04024j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61874108]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province [18JR3RA285]
  3. Basic Scientific Research Business Expenses of the Central University [LZUMMM2020005]
  4. Open Project of Key Laboratory for Magnetism and Magnetic Materials of the Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University [LZUMMM2020005]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2020-kb06, lzujbky-2020-cd02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doping has been demonstrated to be an effective method to improve the properties of two-dimensional materials. In this work, the mechanical and electrical properties, and carrier mobility of substitutionally doped phosphorene with group VA elements have been systematically researched using first-principles density functional theory calculations. All doping systems maintain non-magnetic semiconductor characteristics. Due to the large bond lengths and formation energy, the N-doped phosphorene is the most unstable system in terms of structure and energy. The Sb- and Bi-doped phosphorenes exhibit higher Poisson's ratio anisotropy, and a near-zero Poisson's ratio is found at specific angles. N doping increases phosphorene's bandgap value, whereas As, Sb, and Bi doping decreases it. Furthermore, the N dopant induces a direct-indirect bandgap transition in the phosphorene. This transition is caused by a shift of the valence band maximum. More interestingly, the calculated carrier mobility indicates that the N element doping may be an alternative way to simultaneously improve the electron mobility and hole mobility for phosphorene. Overall, these results provide useful guidance for selecting suitable dopants to enhance the properties of phosphorene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据