4.8 Article

Positive- and Negative-Sequence Current Controller With Direct Discrete-Time Pole Placement for Grid-Tied Converters With LCL Filter

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 7207-7221

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2621754

关键词

Grid-connected converter; LCL filter; parameter sensitivity; state-space current control

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  2. European Commission
  3. European Regional Development Fund [DPI2016-75832]
  4. FPU [FPU14/00683]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditionally, the current control of grid-tied converters with LCL filter is based on proportional-resonant or proportional-integral controllers, which often need an additional active damping method to achieve stability. These solutions do not permit to place the closed-loop poles in convenient locations when dealing with such high-order plants. This constraint results in degraded reference-tracking and disturbance-rejection responses. On the other hand, the existing methods based on direct pole placement or other modern control strategies, do not control with zero steady-state error both positive and negative sequences of the grid current, but only the positive one. This limitation is undesirable under unbalanced grid conditions. This paper presents a current controller for grid-tied converters with LCL filters based on direct discrete-time pole placement. The proposed controller makes it possible to control both positive and negative sequences of the grid-side current with zero steady-state error. Contrarily to the classical resonant controllers, the closed-loop poles can be placed in convenient locations, yielding a fast response with negligible overshoot and low controller effort. Moreover, no additional damping methods of the resonance are necessary to achieve stable operation, regardless of the switching frequency and LCL filter used. Simulation and experimental results that validate the proposal are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据