4.8 Article

A Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Methodology in Three-Phase Inverters for PMSM Drive Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 5590-5600

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2608842

关键词

Bayesian networks; fault diagnosis; open-circuit; permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM); three-phase inverter

资金

  1. Hong Kong Scholars Program [XJ2014004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51309240]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130133120007]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570624]
  5. Applied Basic Research Programs of Qingdao [14-2-4-68-jch]
  6. Science and Technology Project of Huangdao District [2014-1-48]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [14CX02197A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Permanent magnet synchronous motor and power electronics-based three-phase inverter are the major components in the modern industrial electric drive system, such as electrical actuators in an all-electric subsea Christmas tree. Inverters are the weakest components in the drive system, and power switches are the most vulnerable components in inverters. Fault detection and diagnosis of inverters are extremely necessary for improving drive system reliability. Motivated by solving the uncertainty problem in fault diagnosis of inverters, which is caused by various reasons, such as bias and noise of sensors, this paper proposes a Bayesian network-based data-driven fault diagnosis methodology of three-phase inverters. Two output line-to-line voltages for different fault modes are measured, the signal features are extracted using fast Fourier transform, the dimensions of samples are reduced using principal component analysis, and the faults are detected and diagnosed using Bayesian networks. Simulated and experimental data are used to train the fault diagnosis model, as well as validate the proposed fault diagnosis methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据