4.6 Article

Potassium iodide reduces the stability of triple-cation perovskite solar cells

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 10, 期 66, 页码 40341-40350

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra07107b

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/R002754/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/S009213/1]
  3. Saudi Government
  4. EPSRC from the Centre for Doctoral Training in New and Sustainable PV [EP/L01551X/1]
  5. University of Sheffield DTG account
  6. EPSRC
  7. EPSRC [EP/S009213/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. STFC [ST/R002754/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of alkali metal halides to hybrid perovskite materials can significantly impact their crystallisation and hence their performance when used in solar cell devices. Previous work on the use of potassium iodide (KI) in active layers to passivate defects in triple-cation mixed-halide perovskites has been shown to enhance their luminescence efficiency and reduce current-voltage hysteresis. However, the operational stability of KI passivated perovskite solar cells under ambient conditions remains largely unexplored. By investigating perovskite solar cell performance with SnO2 or TiO2 electron transport layers (ETL), we propose that defect passivation using KI is highly sensitive to the composition of the perovskite-ETL interface. We reconfirm findings from previous reports that KI preferentially interacts with bromide ions in mixed-halide perovskites, and - at concentrations >5 mol% in the precursor solution - modifies the primary absorber composition as well as leading to the phase segregation of an undesirable secondary non-perovskite phase (KBr) at high KI concentration. Importantly, by studying both material and device stability under continuous illumination and bias under ambient/high-humidity conditions, we show that this secondary phase becomes a favourable degradation product, and that devices incorporating KI have reduced stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据