4.5 Article

Mathematical Heat Transfer Modeling and Experimental Validation of Lithium-Ion Battery Considering: Tab and Surface Temperature, Separator, Electrolyte Resistance, Anode-Cathode Irreversible and Reversible Heat

期刊

BATTERIES-BASEL
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/batteries6040061

关键词

mathematical model; tab temperature; surface temperature; lithium-ion battery; COMSOL

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Collaborative Research and Development Grant [CRDPJ 537104-18]
  2. University of Waterloo, Chemical Engineering Department, Canada Research Chair Tier I-Zero-Emission Vehicles and Hydrogen Energy Systems [950-232215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temperature and heat produced by lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries in electric and hybrid vehicles is an important field of investigation as it determines the power, performance, and cycle life of the battery pack. This paper presented both laboratory data and simulation results at C-rates of 1C, 2C, 3C, and 4C at an ambient temperature of approximately 23 degrees C. During experiment thermocouples were placed on the surface of the battery. The thermal model assumed constant current discharge and was experimentally validated. It was observed that temperature increased with C-rates at both the surface and the tabs. We note that at 4C the battery temperature increased from 22 degrees C to 47.40 degrees C and the tab temperature increased from 22 degrees C to 52.94 degrees C. Overall, the simulation results showed that more heat was produced in the cathode than the anode, the primary source of heat was the electrolyte resistance, and the battery temperature was the highest near the tabs and in the internal space of the battery. Simulation of the lithium concentration within the battery showed that the lithium concentration was more uniform in the anode than in the cathode. These results can help the accurate thermal design and thermal management of Li-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据