3.8 Article

Optimization of Electrical Stimulation for Safe and Effective Guidance of Human Cells

期刊

BIOELECTRICITY
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 372-381

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/bioe.2020.0019

关键词

electrical stimulation; pulsed electric fields; cell migration; multifield electrotaxis chips; endothelial cells; cell damage

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01EY019101, R21EB015737]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [MURI FA9550-16-10052]
  3. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) [HR001119S0027]
  4. NEI Core Grant, the Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. [P-30 EY012576]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct current (DC) electrical stimulation has been shown to have remarkable effects on regulating cell behaviors. Translation of this technology to clinical uses, however, has to overcome several obstacles, including Joule heat production, changes in pH and ion concentration, and electrode products that are detrimental to cells. Application of DC voltages in thick tissues where their thickness is >0.8 mm caused significant changes in temperature, pH, and ion concentrations. In this study, we developed a multifield and -chamber electrotaxis chip, and various stimulation schemes to determine effective and safe stimulation strategies to guide the migration of human vascular endothelial cells. The electrotaxis chip with a chamber thickness of 1 mm allows 10 voltages applied in one experiment. DC electric fields caused detrimental effects on cells in a 1 mm chamber that mimicking 3D tissue with a decrease in cell migration speed and an increase in necrosis and apoptosis. Using the chip, we were able to select optimal stimulation schemes that were effective in guiding cells with minimal detrimental effects. This experimental system can be used to determine optimal electrical stimulation schemes for cell migration, survival with minimal detrimental effects on cells, which will facilitate to bring electrical stimulation for in vivo use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据