4.1 Article

Effect of nickel oxide morphology on the nitrogen electrochemical reduction reaction

期刊

NANO MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 353-359

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoms.2020.03.002

关键词

Nickel oxide; Morphology structure; Electrocatalytic N-2 reduction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21703161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to study the effect of catalysts' morphology on the electrochemical reduction of nitrogen gas, sample catalysts of NiO with four different morphologies (hollow spherical, sea urchin-shape, cubic block, and rod-like) were prepared. Characterization of the NiO catalysts was carried out using SEM, BET, XRD and electrochemical investigation techniques. The results indicated that the nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) is strictly dependent on the morphology of the NiO catalysts, as the hollow spherical NiO showed the best electrochemical NRR performance of NH3 yield rate (3.21 mu g h(-1) mg(cat.)(-1), 4.19 x 10(-11) mol cm(-2) s(-1)) and Faradaic efficiency (1.37%), which was higher than the yields and efficiencies of the rod-NiO (1.8 mu g h(-1) mg(cat.)(-1), 3.24 x 10(-11) mol cm(-2) s-1, 1.17%), sea urchin-NiO (1.66 mu g h(-1) mg(cat.)(-1), 2.44 x 10(-11) mol cm(-2) s(-1), 1.08%) and cubic block-NiO (1.32 mu g h(-1) mg(cat.)(-1), 2.14 x 10(-11) mol cm(-2) s(-1), 0.81%), respectively. These results match the order of the specific surface area of the NiO samples, with hollow spherical (113.91 m(2) g(-1)) > rod-NiO (55.12 m(2) g(-1)) approximate to sea urchin-NiO (55.29 m(2) g(-1)) > cubic block-NiO (38.57 m(2) g(-1)). This correlation can be attributed to the fact that large specific surface areas can provide more active sites for electrocatalysis. This work demonstrates the effect of the morphology of the NiO catalysts on its electrochemical NRR properties, which could offer some opportunity for the preparation of new electrode materials with improved electrocatalytic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据