4.4 Article

Viscometric functions and rheo-optical properties of dilute polymer solutions: Comparison of FENE-Fraenkel dumbbells with rodlike models

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2020.104395

关键词

Dilute polymer solutions; Viscometric functions; Linear dichroism; FENE-Fraenkel dumbbells; Bead-rod dumbbells; Brownian dynamics

资金

  1. Australian Government
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rigid macromolecules or polymer chains with persistence length on the order of the contour length (or greater) have traditionally been modelled as rods or very stiff springs. The FENE-Fraenkel-spring dumbbell, which is finitely extensible about a non-zero natural length with tunable harmonic stiffness, is one such model which has previously been shown to reproduce bead-rod behaviour in the absence of hydrodynamic interactions. The force law for the FENE-Fraenkel spring reduces to the Hookean or FENE spring force law for appropriately chosen values of the spring parameters. It is consequently possible to explore the crossover region between the limits of bead-spring and bead-rod behaviour by varying the parameters suitably. In this study, using a semi-implicit predictor-corrector Brownian dynamics algorithm, the FENE-Fraenkel spring is shown to imitate a rod with hydrodynamic interactions when spring stiffness, extensibility and simulation timestep are chosen carefully. By relaxing the spring stiffness and extensibility, the FENE-Fraenkel spring can also reproduce spring-like behaviour, such as a crossover from -1/3 to -2/3 power-law scaling in the viscosity with shear rate, and a change from positive to negative second normal stress difference. Furthermore, comparisons with experimental data on the viscosity and linear dichroism of high aspect ratio, rigid macromolecules shows that the extensibility and stiffness of the FENE-Fraenkel spring allows for equal or improved accuracy in modelling inflexible molecules compared to rodlike models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据