4.6 Article

The Optical Luminosity-Time Correlation for More than 100 Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 905, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abcda9

关键词

Gamma-ray bursts

资金

  1. American Astronomical Society Chretienne Grant
  2. Spanish National Research Project [RTI2018-098104-J-I00]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) under the Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships (SULI) program
  4. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav) [CE170100004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are fascinating events due to their panchromatic nature. Their afterglow emission is observed from sub-TeV energies to radio wavelengths. We investigate GRBs that present an optical plateau, leveraging on the resemblance with the X-ray plateau shown in many GRB light curves (LCs). We comprehensively analyze all published GRBs with known redshifts and optical plateau observed mostly by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory (Swift). We fit 267 optical LCs and show the existence of the plateau in 102 cases, which is the largest compilation so far of optical plateaus. For 56 Swift GRBs with optical and X-ray plateaus, we compare the rest-frame end time at both wavelengths (T-opt*, T-X*), and conclude that the plateau is achromatic between T-opt* and T-X*. We also confirm the existence of the two-dimensional relations between Topt* and the optical luminosity at the end of the plateau emission, which resembles the same luminosity-time correlation in X-rays (Dainotti et al. 2013). The existence of this optical correlation has been demonstrated for the largest sample of optical plateaus in the literature to date. The squared scatter in this optical correlation is smallest for the subset of the Gold GRBs with a decrease in the scatter equivalent to 52.4% when compared to the scatter of the entire GRB sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据