4.7 Article

Facile control of inter-crystalline porosity in the synthesis of size-controlled mesoporous MFI zeolites via in situ conversion of silica gel into zeolite nanocrystals for catalytic cracking

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 17, 期 30, 页码 5680-5689

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ce00637f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum-Beijing [YJRC-2013-38]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21206192]
  3. Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120007120010]
  4. State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China [2012CB215002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report here a strategy for the facile synthesis of hierarchical MFI zeolite nanocrystals with controllable inter-crystalline mesopores by a one-step hydrothermal synthesis method using silica gel as the silica source and tetrapropyl ammonium as the microporous template without any other mesoporous templates or zeolite seeds. Powder X-ray diffraction results show the MFI structure with high crystallinity for all as-prepared zeolites. Scanning electron microscope characterization shows that 400-1000 nm zeolite aggregates are composed of the assembly of similar to 100 nm zeolite nanocrystals. Transmission electron microscopy results indicate the formation of inter-crystalline mesopores in the aggregated nanocrystals among the interspace of zeolite nanocrystals. The high mesopore volume (0.13 cm(3) g(-1)) and external surface area (93 cm(2) g(-1)) of the aggregated MFI zeolites are observed by N-2 sorption measurements. The inter-crystalline porosity of MFI zeolites varies with the change in aggregation and the size of zeolite nanocrystals by changing the sodium concentration or the type of sodium salt in aluminate-silicate gels during hydrothermal crystallization. The mesoporous MFI zeolite aggregates exhibit similar light olefin selectivities and remarkably enhanced lifetime in the catalytic cracking of hexane compared to the highly dispersed MFI zeolite nanocrystals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据