4.1 Review

Resveratrol extracted from Chinese herbal medicines: A novel therapeutic strategy for lung diseases

期刊

CHINESE HERBAL MEDICINES
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 349-358

出版社

ELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chmed.2020.07.003

关键词

Chinese herbal medicines; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; lung diseases; pneumonia; resveratrol

资金

  1. Beijing Nova Program of Science Technology [Z191100001119088]
  2. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Specific Grant for double top construction [1000041510168]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung diseases and their related complications represent a critical source of morbidity and mortality glob-ally and have become a research focus in recent years. There are plenty of hazards that threaten the health of lung by exposure to external environmental stimuli, such as dust, cigarette smoke, PM2.5, air pollution and pathogen infection. These risks lead to the impairment of lung function and subsequent lung diseases including pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Compared with antibiotics and corticosteroids therapies, traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions are more effective with fewer side effects. A considerable variety of bioactive ingredients have been extracted and identified from Chinese herbal medicines and are used for the treatment of different lung diseases, including resveratrol. Increasing studies have reported promising therapeutic effects of resveratrol against lung diseases by inhibiting oxidative stress, inflammation, aging, fibrosis and cancer both in vitro and in vivo. In this review, the recent progress in the studies of lung protective effects and underlying mechanisms of resveratrol and also highlight the potency of resveratrol and traditional Chinese prescriptions containing resveratrol as promising therapeutic options were summarized for the treatment of lung and respiratory diseases. (C) 2020 Tianjin Press of Chinese Herbal Medicines. Published by ELSEVIER B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据