4.7 Article

Aqueous dispersed ablated bismuth species and their potential as colloidal Bi precursors in synthetic strategies

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 17, 期 15, 页码 3015-3022

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ce02123a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB931704]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11174287, 50931002, 11204308]
  3. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
  4. Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [YG2012065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intense scientific efforts have been focused on the exploration of the unusual physical and chemical properties of colloidal nanoparticles (NPs). Here, surfactant-free ablated bismuth colloidal species showing distinctive advantages of high reactivity and reducibility were generated by laser-ablating metal Bi in deionized water. They can further react with water molecules and display self-assembly behaviour to form Bi(OH)(3) nanowires at ambient condition. Interestingly, under aging at 60 degrees C or light irradiation, Bi-based colloids will tend to react and self-assemble into phases of Bi2O3 and Bi2O4 nanocrystals. Furthermore, various bismuth-containing compounds, such as bismuth oxyhalides (BiOX, X = Cl, Br, I), Ag/Au/Pt-modified BiOCl, BiVO4, and Bi2WO6 semiconductors were also successfully produced through the reaction of ablated bismuth colloidal species with corresponding chemical reagents or with ablated V and W colloidal species. These synthetic strategies proved that LAL-induced colloidal species are capable of serving as unique chemical precursors. The relatively slow, dynamic species-by-species reaction greatly favours controllable growth and tunable nanostructure compared with the conventional rapid ion-by-ion reaction. Importantly, this growth route provides more underlying insights regarding the growth and assembly mechanisms of nanocrystals without influence from additional chemical ions or surfactants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据