4.5 Article

Catalytic Oligomerization of ethylene over nano-sized HZSM-5

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
卷 93, 期 6, 页码 2550-2557

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2020.09.002

关键词

Ethylene oligomerization; HZSM-5 zeolite; Acidity; Reaction mechanism

资金

  1. Basic Research Plan of Natural Science of Shaanxi Province [2019JLM-1]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing [SKLOP201901001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nano-sized HZSM-5 zeolites with different Si/Al ratios were pretreated, characterized, and tested in ethylene oligomerization performed in a fixed-bed reactor under relatively mild conditions. The effects of catalyst acidity and reaction temperature on the activity, selectivity and stability were investigated, and a possible reaction route of ethylene over acidic sites of nano-sized HZSM-5 catalyst was proposed. In comparison with micro-sized HZSM-5 zeolite, nano-sized HZSM-5 zeolites exhibited higher activity and better resistance to deactivation. Under optimal conditions (T = 275-300 degrees C, P = 3.0 MPa, WHSV = 1.0 h(-1)), The average ethylene conversion was 62.5% over the nano-sized HZSM-5 with an Si/Al ratio of 80, while the selectivity to C4+ olefins and alpha-olefins was 64.3% and 13.3%, respectively. Furthermore, the products of ethylene oligomerization were a complex hydrocarbon mixture due to the acid-catalyzed secondary reactions, for which the distribution of even and odd numbered carbon atoms formed a continuous volcanic shape mainly centered on C-6-C-10. Furthermore, these tests demonstrate that the activity and selectivity of ethylene oligomerization depend on the operating conditions and the acidity of the catalysts. These results indicate that the Bronsted acid sites may be mainly responsible for secondary reactions and deactivation of the catalyst, whereas the Lewis acid sites may be more advantageous for ethylene oligomerization. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Energy Institute.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据