4.7 Article

A Method for Removal of Deep Brain Stimulation Artifact From Local Field Potentials

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2613412

关键词

Artifact removal; deep brain stimulation (DBS); local field potential (LFP); Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61601258, 81527901, 51407103]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z151100003915123]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0105502, 2016YFC0105900]
  4. Major Achievements Transformation Project of Beijing's College
  5. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a signal processing method for the electrophysiology simultaneously recorded during deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a research tool. Regarding the local field potential (LFP) signals recorded during stimulation, a novel method was proposed for removal of stimulation artifacts caused by the much stronger stimulating pulse compared to typical LFP. This artifact suppression method was tested and evaluated in an in vitro situation. The results indicate that the stimulation artifacts are well suppressed by this method. Secondly, this method was tested in vivo in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. It was used to process the LFP signals recorded intraoperatively from PD patients to preliminarily explore the quantitative dependencies of beta band synchronization variations in the subthalamic nucleus (STNs) on the applied DBS parameters, including stimulation voltage, frequency and pulse width. The results confirm that DBS therapy can suppress excessive beta frequency activity and that the degree of attenuation increases with increasing DBS voltage within a range of 1-3 V and increasing DBS frequency within a range of 60-120 Hz. The proposed artifact suppression method provides technical support for exploring the direct effect of electrical stimulation on the brain activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据