4.8 Article

Differential functional connectivity underlying asymmetric reward-related activity in human and nonhuman primates

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2000759117

关键词

orbitofrontal cortex; reward; functional connectivity; lateralization

资金

  1. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University
  2. Wellcome Trust [203139/Z/16/Z, WT100973AIA, 103184/Z/13/Z, 202831/Z/16/Z, 105238/Z/14/Z]
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/T023007/1, MR/P024955/1, G0902373]
  4. Bettencourt Schueller Foundation
  5. Christ Church, University of Oxford
  6. [1U54MH091657]
  7. MRC [MR/P024955/1, G0902373] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. UKRI [MR/T023007/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Wellcome Trust [202831/Z/16/Z, 103184/Z/13/Z, 105238/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is a key brain region involved in complex cognitive functions such as reward processing and decision making. Neuroimaging studies have reported unilateral OFC response to reward-related variables; however, those studies rarely discussed this observation. Nevertheless, some lesion studies suggest that the left and right OFC contribute differently to cognitive processes. We hypothesized that the OFC asymmetrical response to reward could reflect underlying hemispherical difference in OFC functional connectivity. Using resting-state and reward-related functional MRI data from humans and from rhesus macaques, we first identified an asymmetrical response of the lateral OFC to reward in both species. Crucially, the subregion show ing the highest reward-related asymmetry (RRA) overlapped with the region showing the highest functional connectivity asymmetry (FCA). Furthermore, the two types of asymmetries were found to be significantly correlated across individuals. In both species, the right lateral OFC was more connected to the default mode network compared to the left lateral OFC. Altogether, our results suggest a functional specialization of the left and right lateral OFC in primates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据