4.7 Article

Geometric Programming for Optimal Positive Linear Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
卷 65, 期 11, 页码 4648-4663

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2019.2960697

关键词

Delayed linear systems; geometric programming; H-2 norm; H-infinity norm; Hankel norm; positive systems; robust stabilization

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18K13777]
  2. ROIS NII Open Collaborative Research
  3. [17201219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article studies the parameter tuning problem of positive linear systems for optimizing their stability properties. We specifically show that, under certain regularity assumptions on the parameterization, the problem of finding the minimum-cost parameters that achieve a given requirement on a system norm reduces to a geometric program, which, in turn, can be exactly and efficiently solved by convex optimization. The flexibility of geometric programming allows the state, input, and output matrices of the system to simultaneously depend on the parameters to be tuned. The class of system norms under consideration includes the H-2 norm, H-infinity norm, Hankel norm, and Schatten p-norm. Also, the parameter tuning problem for ensuring the robust stability of the system under structural uncertainties is shown to be solved by geometric programming. The proposed optimization framework is further extended to delayed positive linear systems, where it is shown that the parameter tuning problem jointly constrained by the exponential decay rate, the L-1-gain, and the L-infinity-gain can be solved by convex optimization. The assumption on the system parameterization is stated in terms of posynomial functions, which form a broad class of functions and thus allow us to deal with various interesting positive linear systems arising from, for example, dynamical buffer networks and epidemic spreading processes. We present numerical examples to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed optimization framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据