4.7 Article

Hermes: Latency Optimal Task Assignment for Resource-constrained Mobile Computing

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 3056-3069

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2017.2679712

关键词

Mobile cloud computing; computational offloading; approximation algorithms; on-line learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With mobile devices increasingly able to connect to cloud servers from anywhere, resource-constrained devices can potentially perform offloading of computational tasks to either save local resource usage or improve performance. It is of interest to find optimal assignments of tasks to local and remote devices that can take into account the application- specific profile, availability of computational resources, and link connectivity, and find a balance between energy consumption costs of mobile devices and latency for delay-sensitive applications. We formulate an NP-hard problem to minimize the application latency while meeting prescribed resource utilization constraints. Different from most of existing works that either rely on the integer programming solver, or on heuristics that offer no theoretical performance guarantees, we propose Hermes, a novel fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS). We identify for a subset of problem instances, where the application task graphs can be described as serial trees, Hermes provides a solution with latency no more than (1 + epsilon) times of the minimum while incurring complexity that is polynomial in problem size and 1/epsilon. We further propose an online algorithm to learn the unknown dynamic environment and guarantee that the performance gap compared to the optimal strategy is bounded by a logarithmic function with time. Evaluation is done by using real data set collected from several benchmarks, and is shown that Hermes improves the latency by 16 percent compared to a previously published heuristic and increases CPU computing time by only 0: 4 percent of overall latency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据