4.6 Article

Untargeted metabolomics profiling and hemoglobin normalization for archived newborn dried blood spots from a refrigerated biorepository

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113574

关键词

Metabolomics; Hemoglobin; Sample storage; Dried blood spot; LC-MS; Newborn screening

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [U2CES026561, U2CES030859, P30ES23515]
  2. Orebro University Hospital Research Foundation [OLL-790011]
  3. Swedish Foundation For Strategic Research [RB13-0160]
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) [RB13-0160] Funding Source: Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Archived dried blood spots (DBS) following newborn screening are an attractive resource for interrogating early-life biology using untargeted metabolomics. Therefore, they have the potential to substantially aid etiological studies, particularly for rare and low-frequency childhood diseases and disorders. However, metabolite quantification in DBS is hindered by variation sources not present in serum and plasma samples such as the hematocrit effect and unknown initial blood volumes. Hemoglobin (Hb) is an appropriate correlate for hematocrit in experimentally-generated DBS punches. However, since many biorepositories worldwide archive DBS at 4-5 degrees C, there is a need to validate the utility of Hb for DBS archived under refrigeration. We evaluated two simple spectroscopic methods for measuring Hb in DBS stored at 4 +/- 2 degrees C for up to 21 years, obtained from the newborn screening program at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Spearman correlation analysis and Akaike Information Criterion model selection found that measurement of a Hb sodium lauryl sulfate complex at 540 nm better described nuisance variation than Hb measured at 404 nm, or using age of spot alone. This is the first study to profile metabolites and to propose a normalization factor for metabolite measurements from DBS archived for decades at 4 degrees C. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据