4.7 Article

Spatial Statistics for Segmenting Histological Structures in H&E Stained Tissue Images

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 1522-1532

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2681519

关键词

Histopathological image analysis; image segmentation; evaluation metrics; graph partitioning; image statistics

资金

  1. PA Department of Health SAP [4100054875]
  2. NIH Cancer Center-Chemical Biology Facility [P30CA047904]
  3. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  4. internal Pitt-GE Global Research [824]
  5. NHGRI through BD2K initiative [U54HG008540]
  6. UPMC Center for Commercial Applications of Healthcare Data [711077]
  7. NIH/NCI [U01CA20482601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Segmenting a broad class of histological structures in transmitted light and/or fluorescence-based images is a prerequisite for determining the pathological basis of cancer, elucidating spatial interactions between histological structures in tumor microenvironments (e.g., tumor infiltrating lymphocytes), facilitating precision medicine studies with deep molecular profiling, and providing an exploratory tool for pathologists. This paper focuses on segmenting histological structures in hematoxylin-and eosin-stained images of breast tissues, e.g., invasive carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, atypical and normal ducts, adipose tissue, and lymphocytes. We propose two graph-theoretic segmentation methods based on local spatial color and nuclei neighborhood statistics. For benchmarking, we curated a data set of 232 high-power field breast tissue images together with expertly annotated ground truth. To accurately model the preference for histological structures (ducts, vessels, tumor nets, adipose, etc.) over the remaining connective tissue and non-tissue areas in ground truth annotations, we propose a new region-based score for evaluating segmentation algorithms. We demonstrate the improvement of our proposed methods over the state-of-the-art algorithms in both region-and boundary-based performance measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据