4.6 Article

The CHEK2 Variant C.349A>G Is Associated with Prostate Cancer Risk and Carriers Share a Common Ancestor

期刊

CANCERS
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113254

关键词

prostate cancer; founder variant; CHEK2; cancer predisposition

类别

资金

  1. IPO-Porto Research Center [CI-IPOP-16-2012]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PEst-OE/SAU/ UI0776/2014, PTDC/DTP-PIC/1308/2014]
  3. FCT [UID/DTP/00776/2013/POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006868, SFRH/BD/71397/2010, SFRH/BD/73719/2010]
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  5. European Commission [223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175)]
  6. Cancer Research UK [C5047/A7357, C1287/A10118, C1287/A16563, C5047/A3354, C5047/A10692, C16913/A6135, A8197/A16565]
  7. National Institute of Health (NIH) Cancer Post-Cancer GWAS initiative [1 U19 CA 148537-01]
  8. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U19 CA 148537, X01HG007492, HHSN268201200008I]
  9. NIH NCI [U01 CA188392]
  10. Institute of Cancer Research
  11. Everyman Campaign
  12. Prostate Cancer Research Foundation
  13. PCUK
  14. Orchid Cancer Appeal
  15. Rosetrees Trust
  16. National Cancer Research Network UK
  17. National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) UK
  18. NIHR
  19. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/73719/2010, PEst-OE/SAU/UI0776/2014, SFRH/BD/71397/2010, PTDC/DTP-PIC/1308/2014] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simple Summary It is well-recognised the strong contribution of genetic factors to prostate cancer (PrCa) susceptibility, thus genetic screening is critical for presymptomatic diagnosis and identification of individuals at high-risk. In this context, recurrent founder variants in cancer predisposing genes, by providing specific targets for early identification of carriers at risk of developing the disease, may be leveraged to implement cost-efficient targeted genetic screening strategies. The goal of this study was to investigate whether CHEK2 c.349A>G, the only recurrent likely pathogenic variant in CHEK2 gene reported in the Portuguese population, plays an important role in PrCa development, and the possibility of a founder effect behind its origin. Our results clearly demonstrate that c.349A>G in the CHEK2 tumour-suppressor gene is a founder variant significantly associated with an increased risk of PrCa, suggesting its potential usefulness for cost-effective targeted genetic screening in PrCa families. The identification of recurrent founder variants in cancer predisposing genes may have important implications for implementing cost-effective targeted genetic screening strategies. In this study, we evaluated the prevalence and relative risk of the CHEK2 recurrent variant c.349A>G in a series of 462 Portuguese patients with early-onset and/or familial/hereditary prostate cancer (PrCa), as well as in the large multicentre PRACTICAL case-control study comprising 55,162 prostate cancer cases and 36,147 controls. Additionally, we investigated the potential shared ancestry of the carriers by performing identity-by-descent, haplotype and age estimation analyses using high-density SNP data from 70 variant carriers belonging to 11 different populations included in the PRACTICAL consortium. The CHEK2 missense variant c.349A>G was found significantly associated with an increased risk for PrCa (OR 1.9; 95% CI: 1.1-3.2). A shared haplotype flanking the variant in all carriers was identified, strongly suggesting a common founder of European origin. Additionally, using two independent statistical algorithms, implemented by DMLE+2.3 and ESTIAGE, we were able to estimate the age of the variant between 2300 and 3125 years. By extending the haplotype analysis to 14 additional carrier families, a shared core haplotype was revealed among all carriers matching the conserved region previously identified in the high-density SNP analysis. These findings are consistent with CHEK2 c.349A>G being a founder variant associated with increased PrCa risk, suggesting its potential usefulness for cost-effective targeted genetic screening in PrCa families.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据