4.2 Article

Evaluation of Different IgY Preparation Methods and Storage Stability as Potential Animal Feed Supplement

期刊

PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 52, 期 6, 页码 2305-2311

出版社

ZOOLOGICAL SOC PAKISTAN
DOI: 10.17582/journal.pjz/20190612010610

关键词

Feed additives; IgY antibody; Stability; Yolk powder; Feed supplement

类别

资金

  1. science and technology program in Urumqi, Xinjiang [P161310001]
  2. International Scientific and Technological cooperation and exchange program in Shaanxi province [2017KW-ZD-10]
  3. Key Construction Program of International Cooperation Base in S & T, Shaanxi Province, China [2015SD0018]
  4. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Egg yolk can be used as feed additives to improve the immune status of animals and as passive therapy for veterinary diseases, and the egg yolk has proved to be a promising source of antibodies. However, the extraction methods and storage stability of IgY antibodies from egg yolk for feed supplements remain major problems in mass production. Based on Based on IgY antibody titer, IgY thermostability, IgY acid and alkali resistance, resistance to trypsin and pepsin, four different IgY purification methods (PEG extraction, water dilution method, the effect of liquid egg yolk and egg yolk powder preparations) on the activity of IgY antibodies was investigated. The results showed that IgY was stable below 70 oC, and the activity was significantly lost when it exceeded 70 degrees C; IgY was relatively stable in the range of pH 4-10, and the activity was significantly lost beyond this range; IgY had certain resistance to pepsin and trypsin. Among all four purification methods, the IgY antibody titer in liquid egg yolk and egg yolk powder was significantly higher than the other two methods. Moreover, egg yolk powder can prevent bacterial contamination and inactivation due to the formation of sediment. This study provide basic data for IgY application in animal feed supplements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据