4.6 Article

Atomic level design of single iron atom embedded mesoporous hollow carbon spheres as multi-effect nanoreactors for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 8, 期 45, 页码 23772-23783

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta07010f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA17020404]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0100100]
  3. R&D Projects in Key Areas of Guangdong Province [2019B090908001]
  4. DICP [DICP & QIBEBT UN201702]
  5. QIBEBT [DICP & QIBEBT UN201702]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The practical application of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries is still facing the challenges of lithium polysulfide (LiPS) shuttling and uncontrollable Li2S growth due to the soluble nature and sluggish conversion kinetics of LiPSs. Herein, we propose a universal strategy to synthesize monodisperse iron atom embedded nitrogen-doped mesoporous hollow carbon spheres (Fe-N/MHCS) as multi-effect nanoreactors for sulfur at the atomic level. Using a combination of experimental and theoretical methods, the Fe-N-4 center is found to be an efficient electrocatalyst to propel the reversible conversion between LiPSs and Li2S, inhibit the LiPS shuttling and mediate the deposition of Li2S. As a result, S@Fe-N/MHCS exhibits significantly improved rate properties and cycling stability (only 0.0187% capacity fade in 1000 cycles at 1C) without using conductive carbon. Even at a practical high sulfur loading (5.4 mg cm(-2)) and low E/S ratio (8.0 mL mg(-1)), the areal capacity reaches 6.4 mA h cm(-2) and 81.7% of it is retained after 100 cycles. Furthermore, a S@Fe-N/MHCS pouch cell is also assembled showing exceptional cycling stability with a high capacity retention of 77.1% after 200 cycles. Therefore, this work provides valuable insights into the fundamental understanding of the catalysis mechanism for practical Li-S batteries with high specific energy and prolonged lifespan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据