4.6 Article

Seasonal Patterns of Dominant Microbes Involved in Central Nutrient Cycles in the Subsurface

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8111694

关键词

metaproteomics; microbial communities; subsurface; nutrient cycles; critical zone

资金

  1. Collaborative Research Centre 1076 AquaDiva (CRC AquaDiva) - German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Graduate School for Environmental Research (HIGRADE)
  3. integrated research training group (iRTG) Aqua Diva

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial communities play a key role for central biogeochemical cycles in the subsurface. Little is known about whether short-term seasonal drought and rewetting events influence the dominant microbes involved in C- and N-cycles. Here, we applied metaproteomics at different subsurface sites in winter, summer and autumn from surface litter layer, seepage water at increasing subsoil depths and remote located groundwater from two wells within the Hainich Critical Zone Exploratory, Germany. We observed changes in the dominance of microbial families at subsurface sampling sites with increasing distances, i.e., Microcoleaceae dominated in topsoil seepage, while Candidatus Brocadiaceae dominated at deeper and more distant groundwater wells. Nitrifying bacteria showed a shift in dominance from drought to rewetting events from summer by Nitrosomandaceae to autumn by Candidatus Brocadiaceae. We further observed that the reductive pentose phosphate pathway was a prominent CO2-fixation strategy, dominated by Woeseiaceae in wet early winter, which decreased under drought conditions and changed to a dominance of Sphingobacteriaceae under rewetting conditions. This study shows that increasing subsurface sites and rewetting event after drought alter the dominances of key subsurface microbes. This helps to predict the consequences of annual seasonal dynamics on the nutrient cycling microbes that contribute to ecosystem functioning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据