4.4 Article

Protonation State of a Key Histidine Ligand in the Iron-Quinone Complex of Photosystem II as Revealed by Light-Induced ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 59, 期 45, 页码 4336-4343

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00810

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17H05721, JP19H04722, JP19H02674, JP17H06435, JP17H03662, JP17H06433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The iron-quinone complex in photosystem II (PSII) consists of the two plastoquinone electron acceptors, Q(A) and Q(B), and a non-heme iron connecting them. It has been suggested that nearby histidine residues play important roles in the electron and proton transfer reactions of the iron-quinone complex in PSII. In this study, we investigated the protonation/deprotonation reaction of D1-H215, which bridges the non-heme iron and Q(B), using attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy. Flash-induced Fe2+/Fe3+ ATR-FTIR difference spectra were measured with PSII membranes in the pH range of 5.0-7.5. In the CN stretching region of histidine, the intensity of a negative peak at 1094 cm(-1), which was assigned to the deprotonated anion form of D1-H215, increased as the pH increased. Singular-value decomposition analysis provided a component due to deprotonation of D1-H215 with a pK(a) of similar to 5.5 in the Fe3+ state, whereas no component of histidine deprotonation was resolved in the Fe2+ state. This observation supports the previous proposal that D1-H215 is responsible for the proton release upon Fe2+ oxidation [Berthomieu, C., and Hienerwadel, R. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4044-4052]. The pH dependence of the C-13 isotope-edited bands of the bicarbonate ligand to the non-heme iron further showed that deprotonation of bicarbonate to carbonate does not take place at pH <8 in the Fe2+ or Fe3+ state. These results suggest that the putative mechanism of proton transfer to Q(B)H(-) through D1-H215 and bicarbonate around Fe2+ functions throughout the physiological pH range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据