4.7 Article

The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 241-261

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.044

关键词

Digital circular economy; Digitalization; Circular economy; Sustainability; Industry 4.0; Big data analytics

类别

资金

  1. research project CIRCit (Circular Economy Integration in the Nordic Industry for Enhanced Sustainability and Competitiveness), Nordic Green Growth Research and Innovation Programme [83144]
  2. NordForsk
  3. Nordic Energy Research
  4. Nordic Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital technologies (DTs), such as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and data analytics, are considered essential enablers of the circular economy (CE). However, as both CE and DTs are emerging fields, there exists little systematic guidance on how DTs can be applied to capture the full potential of circular strategies for improving resource efficiency and productivity. Furthermore, there is little insight into the supporting business analytics (BA) capabilities required to accomplish this. To address this gap, this paper conducts a theoryand practice-based review, resulting in the Smart CE framework that supports translating the circular strategies central to the goals of manufacturing companies in con-tributing the United Nation's (UN) 12th Sustainable Development Goal, that is, sustainable consumption and production, into the BA requirements of DTs. Both scholars and practitioners may find the framework useful to (1) create a common language for aligning activities across the boundaries of disciplines such as information systems and the CE body of knowledge, and (2) identify the gap between the current and entailed BA requirements and identify the strategic initiatives needed to close it. Additionally, the framework is used to organize a database of case examples to identify some best practices related to specific smart circular strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据