4.7 Article

Bilevel Feature Extraction-Based Text Mining for Fault Diagnosis of Railway Systems

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2521866

关键词

Text mining; feature selection; fault diagnosis; railway systems

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61473029]
  2. U.S. NSF [CMMI-1162482]
  3. Railway Ministry of Science Technology Research and Development Program [2014X008-A]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety of Beijing Jiaotong University [RCS2016ZT010, RCS2014ZT27]
  5. FDCT (Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciencias e da Tecnologia) [119/2014/A3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A vast amount of text data is recorded in the forms of repair verbatim in railway maintenance sectors. Efficient text mining of such maintenance data plays an important role in detecting anomalies and improving fault diagnosis efficiency. However, unstructured verbatim, high-dimensional data, and imbalanced fault class distribution pose challenges for feature selections and fault diagnosis. We propose a bilevel feature extraction-based text mining that integrates features extracted at both syntax and semantic levels with the aim to improve the fault classification performance. We first perform an improved chi(2) statistics-based feature selection at the syntax level to overcome the learning difficulty caused by an imbalanced data set. Then, we perform a prior latent Dirichlet allocation-based feature selection at the semantic level to reduce the data set into a low-dimensional topic space. Finally, we fuse fault features derived from both syntax and semantic levels via serial fusion. The proposed method uses fault features at different levels and enhances the precision of fault diagnosis for all fault classes, particularly minority ones. Its performance has been validated by using a railway maintenance data set collected from 2008 to 2014 by a railway corporation. It outperforms traditional approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据