4.7 Article

Engineering of α-PD-1 antibody-expressing long-lived plasma cells by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted gene integration

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-020-03187-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Special Research Program of China for Important Infectious Diseases [2018ZX10302103, 2017ZX10202102]
  2. Important Key Program of the Natural Science Foundation of China [81730060]
  3. International Collaboration Program of the Natural Science Foundation of China [81561128007]
  4. U.S. NIH [81561128007]
  5. Joint-Innovation Program in Healthcare for Special Scientific Research Projects of Guangzhou [201803040002]
  6. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515010882]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) are robust specialized antibody-secreting cells that mainly stay in the bone marrow and can persist a lifetime. As they can be generated by inducing the differentiation of B-lymphocytes, we investigated the possibility that human LLPCs might be engineered to express alpha -PD-1 monoclonal antibody to substitute recombinant alpha -PD-1 antitumor immunotherapy. To this end, we inserted an alpha -PD-1 cassette into the GAPDH locus through Cas9/sgRNA-guided specific integration in B-lymphocytes, which was mediated by an integrase-defective lentiviral vector. The edited B cells were capable of differentiating into LLPCs both in vitro and in vivo. Transcriptional profiling analysis confirmed that these cells were typical LLPCs. Importantly, these cells secreted de novo antibodies persistently, which were able to inhibit human melanoma growth via an antibody-mediated checkpoint blockade in xenograft-tumor mice. Our work suggests that the engineered LLPCs may be utilized as a vehicle to constantly produce special antibodies for long-term cellular immunotherapy to eradicate tumors and cellular reservoirs for various pathogens including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B virus (HBV).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据