4.6 Article

Automated Lung Ultrasound B-Line Assessment Using a Deep Learning Algorithm

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3002249

关键词

Ultrasonic imaging; Lung; Deep learning; Training; Diseases; Classification algorithms; Biomedical imaging; Medical imaging; medical signal and image processing; medical ultrasonics; signal and image processing

资金

  1. Philips Research North America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shortness of breath is a major reason that patients present to the emergency department (ED) and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been shown to aid in diagnosis, particularly through evaluation for artifacts known as B-lines. B-line identification and quantification can be a challenging skill for novice ultrasound users, and experienced users could benefit from a more objective measure of quantification. We sought to develop and test a deep learning (DL) algorithm to quantify the assessment of B-lines in lung ultrasound. We utilized ultrasound clips ( n = 400) froman existing database of ED patients to provide training and test sets to develop and test the DL algorithm based on deep convolutional neural networks. Interpretations of the images by algorithm were compared to expert human interpretations on binary and severity (a scale of 04) classifications. Our model yielded a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81%-98%) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI 84%-99%) for the presence or absence of B-lines compared to expert read, with a kappa of 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.97). Model to expert agreement for severity classificationyielded aweighted kappa of 0.65 (95% CI 0.56074). Overall, the DL algorithm performed well and could be integrated into an ultrasound system in order to help diagnose and track B-line severity. The algorithm is better at distinguishing the presence from the absence of B-lines but can also be successfully used to distinguish between B-line severity. Suchmethods could decreasevariabilityand provide a standardizedmethod for improved diagnosis and outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据