4.7 Article

Poly(N,N′-Diethylacrylamide)-Based Thermoresponsive Hydrogels with Double Network Structure

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym12112502

关键词

thermoresponsive hydrogel; double network; poly(N,N '-diethylacrylamide); swelling; differential scanning calorimetry; NMR spectroscopy

资金

  1. Operational Programme Prague-Competitiveness [CZ.2.16/3.1.00/21566]
  2. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temperature response of double network (DN) hydrogels composed of thermoresponsive poly(N,N '-diethylacrylamide) (PDEAAm) and hydrophilic polyacrylamide (PAAm) or poly(N,N '-dimethylacrylamide) (PDMAAm) was studied by a combination of swelling measurements, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and H-1 NMR and UV-Vis spectroscopies. Presence of the second hydrophilic network in DN hydrogels influenced their thermal sensitivity significantly. DN hydrogels show less intensive changes in deswelling, smaller enthalpy, and entropy changes connected with phase transition and broader temperature interval of the transition than the single network (SN) hydrogels. Above the transition, the DN hydrogels contain significantly more permanently bound water in comparison with SN hydrogels due to interaction of water with the hydrophilic component. Unlike swelling and DSC experiments, a rather abrupt transition was revealed from temperature-dependent NMR spectra. Release study showed that model methylene blue molecules are released from SN and DN hydrogels within different time scale. New thermodynamical model of deswelling behaviour based on the approach of the van't Hoff analysis was developed. The model allows to determine thermodynamic parameters connected with temperature-induced volume transition, such as the standard change of enthalpy and entropy and critical temperatures and characterize the structurally different states of water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据