4.5 Article

An effective improved co-evolution ant colony optimisation algorithm with multi-strategies and its application

期刊

出版社

INDERSCIENCE ENTERPRISES LTD
DOI: 10.1504/IJBIC.2020.111267

关键词

ant colony optimisation; ACO; multi-population co-evolution; elitist retention; pheromone control strategy; adaptive dynamic update; gate allocation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771087, 51605068, 51475065]
  2. Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions of Chongqing University [SKLMT-KFKT-201803]
  3. Traction Power State Key Laboratory of Southwest Jiaotong University [TPL2002]
  4. Open Subject Project of the Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Control Operation Planning and Safety Technology of CAUC [600001010932]
  5. Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation Guidance Project [2019-ZD-0099, 20170540145]
  6. Science and Technology Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education [JDL2019025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an effective improved co-evolution ant colony optimisation (MSICEAO) algorithm is presented to solve complex optimisation problem. In the MSICEAO, the multi-population co-evolution strategy is used to divide initial population into several sub-populations to interchange and share information. The weighted initial pheromone distribution strategy is used to improve the efficiency and adjust the pheromone factor and distance factor. The elitist retention strategy is used to improve the solution quality. The adaptive dynamic update strategy for pheromone evaporation rate is used to balance the convergence speed and solution quality. The aggregation pheromone diffusion mechanism is used to enhance the cooperative effect and highlight the cooperative idea of swarm intelligence. In order to verify the effectiveness of the MSICEAO, the experiments have been carried out on eight TSPs and one actual gate allocation problem. The MSICEAO is compared with five state-of-the-art algorithms of TS, GA, PSO, ACO and PSACO. The experiment results demonstrate that the MSICEAO is significantly better than the compared methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据