4.7 Article

Fabrication of biodegradable poly (lactic acid)/carbon nanotube nanocomposite foams: Significant improvement on rheological property and foamability

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.094

关键词

Poly (lactic acid); Multi-walled carbon nanotube; Nanocomposite; Foam; Rheological property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51703004, 51703039]
  2. Top Young Innovative Talents Program of Beijing Municipal University [CITTCD201704041]
  3. School Level Cultivation Fund of Beijing Technology and Business University for Distinguished and Excellent Young Scholars [BTBUYP2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, biodegradable macromolecules have been highly desired as a promising alternative for traditional oil-based plastics to work out the eco crisis and biological health problems triggered by microplastics. Herein, we presented a simple, effective, environmentally friendly and CO2-based foaming methodology for fabricating ultra-low-density poly (lactic acid)/carbon nanotube (PLA/CNTs) nanocomposite foam. By the gradual incorporation of CNTs, three kinds of networks generated in PLA/CNTs nanocomposites and had a distinct reinforcement influence on their melt viscoelasticity, which testified by transmission electron microscope, electrical conductivity and rheological property measurements, severally. Specifically, the storage modulus of PLA/CNTs nanocomposites were 3 orders of magnitude higher in contrast to pure PLA. Interestingly, relative to that under regular differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), a double melting peak phenomenon appeared in the high-pressure DSC curves of diverse PLA specimens. Biodegradable PLA/CNTs nanocomposite foam was successfully fabricated with a super-high volume expansion ratio (VER) of 49.6 times, which could offer a promising strategy for developing other thermoplastic polyester foams with ultra-high VER to obtain some unique functional attributes. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据