4.7 Article

Pulmonary surfactant inhibition of nanoparticle uptake by alveolar epithelial cells

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76332-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) through Labex Science and Engineering for Advanced Materials and devices (SEAM) [ANR 11 LABX 086, ANR 11 IDEX 05 02]
  2. Commissariat a l'Investissement d'Avenir (CGI) through Labex Science and Engineering for Advanced Materials and devices (SEAM) [ANR 11 LABX 086, ANR 11 IDEX 05 02]
  3. French National Research Agency [ANR-10-INSB-04]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-13-BS08-0015, ANR-12-CHEX-0011, ANR-15-CE18-0024-01, ANR-17-CE09-0017]
  5. Solvay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulmonary surfactant forms a sub-micrometer thick fluid layer that covers the surface of alveolar lumen and inhaled nanoparticles therefore come in to contact with surfactant prior to any interaction with epithelial cells. We investigate the role of the surfactant as a protective physical barrier by modeling the interactions using silica-Curosurf-alveolar epithelial cell system in vitro. Electron microscopy displays that the vesicles are preserved in the presence of nanoparticles while nanoparticle-lipid interaction leads to formation of mixed aggregates. Fluorescence microscopy reveals that the surfactant decreases the uptake of nanoparticles by up to two orders of magnitude in two models of alveolar epithelial cells, A549 and NCI-H441, irrespective of immersed culture on glass or air-liquid interface culture on transwell. Confocal microscopy corroborates the results by showing nanoparticle-lipid colocalization interacting with the cells. Our work thus supports the idea that pulmonary surfactant plays a protective role against inhaled nanoparticles. The effect of surfactant should therefore be considered in predictive assessment of nanoparticle toxicity or drug nanocarrier uptake. Models based on the one presented in this work may be used for preclinical tests with engineered nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据