4.5 Article

Physical activity and renal function in the Italian kidney transplant population

期刊

RENAL FAILURE
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 1192-1204

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1847723

关键词

eGFR; exercise; kidney transplant recipients; mixed-regression-analysis; physical activity; propensity score match; renal function; sedentary lifestyle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The well-documented benefits of physical activity (PA) are still poorly characterized in long-term kidney transplant outcome. This study analyzed the impact over a 10-year follow-up of PA on graft function in Italian kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Methods Since 2002, the Italian Transplant-Information-System collected donor and recipient baseline and transplant-related parameters in KTRs. In 2015, 'penchant for PA' (PA >= 30-min, 5 times/week) was added. Stable patients aged >= 18 years at the time of first-transplantation were eligible. KTRs with at least 10-year follow-up were also analyzed. Mixed-effect regression models were used to compare eGFR changes over time in active versus non-active patients. Results PA information was available for 6,055 KTRs (active 51.6%, non-active 48.4%). Lower penchant for PA was found in overweight and obese patients (OR = 0.84; OR = 0.48, respectively), in those with longer dialysis vintage (OR = 0.98 every year of dialysis), and older age at transplant. Male subjects showed greater penchant for PA (OR = 1.25). A slower decline of eGFR over time was observed in active KTRs compared to non-active, and this finding was confirmed in the subgroup with at least 10-year follow-up (n = 2,060). After applying the propensity score matching to reduce confounding factors, mixed-effect regression models corroborated such better long-term trend of graft function preservation in active KTRs. Conclusions Penchant for PA is more frequent among male and younger KTRs. Moreover, in our group of Italian KTRs, active patients revealed higher eGFR values and preserved kidney function over time, up to 10-years of follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据