3.8 Article

On the common topological conditions for shear-coupled twin boundary migration in bcc and hcp metals

期刊

LETTERS ON MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 537-542

出版社

RUSSIAN ACAD SCIENCES, INST METALS SUPERPLASTICITY PROBLEMS
DOI: 10.22226/2410-3535-2020-4-537-542

关键词

twin boundary; twin growth; topological aspects; shear-coupled migration; molecular dynamics

资金

  1. Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 [661913, 755039]
  2. Spanish MINECO [FIS2015-69017-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most abundant deformation twins in metals with hcp and bcc crystallographic structures, i.e. (10-12) and (112) respectively, proceed with the same mechanism of deformation under an applied shear stress, i.e. shear-coupled twin boundary migration. Despite the differences in the atomic structure and degrees of symmetry of bcc and hcp crystals, the topological aspects that rule the processes of growth and shrinkage of these deformation twins are equivalent. In this paper, we revisit the atomic level processes, occurring at the interfaces, through which both coherent twin boundaries displace in a conservative manner and accommodate deformation. These processes include the creation of a twin boundary dislocation that acts as a source of disconnections, namely, line defects at the interface that have both dislocation and step character. The glide of disconnections along the twin boundary is responsible for the displacement of the interface, implying the growth or shrink of the twin. We describe the interaction of these twins with crystal dislocations and show that the product of the interaction is a source of disconnections. We show that these interactions can be described in terms of the structure of the interfaces and the Burgers vector of dislocations. The study is based on the topological theory of interfacial defects and we show the usefulness of the dichromatic pattern associated to each interface in the prediction and analysis of the interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据