4.7 Article

Consumer control and abiotic stresses constrain coastal saltmarsh restoration

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111110

关键词

Liaohe estuary; Suaeda salsa; Coastal restoration; Bottom-up paradigm; Top-down control; Herbivory

资金

  1. Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1901212, 51639001]
  2. Fund for Innovative Research Group of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51721093]
  3. USA National Science Foundation [1637630, 1832221]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Die-off of coastal wetlands has been reported worldwide. Planting habitat-forming species is an important strategy to reverse the decline of coastal wetlands. However, how abiotic environmental stresses and consumers affect the establishment of the planted vegetation species is unclear. We reported a large-scale restoration project in the Liaohe estuary, China, where native pioneer plant Suaeda salsa was planted. We evaluated the growth performance of the planted S. salsa, and identified the constraints on the establishment of planted S. salsa. Results showed that the growth performance (density, coverage and survival rate) of planted S. salsa was better in the low restored marsh than that in the high restored marsh. The death of planted S. salsa was primarily driven by crab herbivory, followed by abiotic stresses (low soil moisture and high salinity) in the high restored marsh, whereas plant death was only driven by crab herbivory in the low restored marsh. Herbivory strength in the high marsh was significantly higher than that in the low marsh. Our findings challenge the bottom-up paradigm used as the foundation for coastal restoration, and highlight the overlooked role of consumers. Therefore, protection measures against consumer pressure, especially in physically harsh conditions, should be considered to enhance the success of coastal wetland restoration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据