4.7 Article

Impact of hydrochar and biochar amendments on sorption and biodegradation of organophosphorus pesticides during transport through Danube alluvial sediment

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111156

关键词

Column experiments; Retardation; Alluvial sediment; Organic compounds; Chars; Bacillus megaterium

资金

  1. Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research, Republic of Serbia, Autonomous Province of Vojvodina [142-451-2128/2019-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the transport behaviour of selected organophosphorus pesticides, OPPs (chlorpyrifos, CP; chlorpyrifos-methyl, CPM; chlorfenvinphos, CF) through Danube alluvial sediment in the presence of hydrochars and biochars. The investigated hydrochar, obtained at three different temperatures (180 degrees C, 200 degrees Cand 220 degrees C), originated from sugar beet shreds (SBS) and Miscanthusxgiganteus (MIS). Results are described by conventional advective-dispersive equation (ADE). Retardation coefficients (R d ) for all OPPs were in the range 6.2-16. Biodegradation was 4.15 and 1.80 for CPM and CP, respectively, while for CF biodegradation did not occur. The addition of carbon rich materials increases retardation of all OPPs in the range from 4 to 18 times depending on the material. Column experiment results indicated that biodegradation of OPPs occurred (up to lambda = 13). In order to confirm that biodegradation occurred in the column experiments, we isolated OPPs degrading microorganisms for the first time from the alluvial sediment. A strain capable of degrading CP and CPM was isolated and identified as Bacillus megaterium BD5 based on biochemical properties, MALDI TOF and 16S rRNA analysis (99.54% identity). The results demonstrate that hydmchars, biochars and isolated degrading bacteria may be effective agents for reducing the mobility of or removing OPPs in contaminated soils or sediments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据