4.0 Article

Effects of sperm to egg ratio, stocking density, delay of gamete contact, temperature and salinity on fertilisation success and D-larvae production of green mussel, Perna viridis

期刊

MOLLUSCAN RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 345-353

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13235818.2020.1836715

关键词

Bivalve; gamete liberation; fertilised egg; egg incubation; embryonic development; hatchery production; viability of oocytes; normal larvae; motility; polyspermy

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology-Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic, and Natural Resources Research and Development (DOSTPCAARRD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mariculture of green mussel (Perna viridis) is being hindered by reliance on seed from the wild. Hatchery production helps increase seed stock, but little is known about the factors that may affect hatchery practices. Development of hatchery protocols to optimise production is therefore needed. This study determined factors affecting fertilisation and survival at the D-hinged stage namely: sperm to egg ratio; delay in gamete contact; egg stocking density; temperature; and salinity. Results indicated that maximum fertilisation and survival at the hinged stage was achieved at 50:1 sperm to egg ratio. Stocking density variation between 20 and 50 eggs mL(-1) had no significant effect on fertilisation, however, there was significantly higher survival from fertilised egg to the D-hinged stage at 20 eggs mL(-1) than at 50 eggs mL(-1) with non-significant reductions at 30-40 eggs mL(-1). Delay in gamete contact significantly affects fertilisation but not D-hinged survival. Fertilisation was significantly higher one hour after gamete liberation, but declined thereafter. Mussel eggs were successfully fertilised at varying temperatures from 25 degrees C to 35 degrees C, while a higher fertilisation rate was observed at a salinity of 28-31 ppt. For survival to the D-hinged stage, optimum temperature and salinity ranged from 28 degrees C to 30 degrees C and 28-31 ppt, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据