4.8 Article

Regioisomeric control of layered crystallinity in solution-processable organic semiconductors

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 46, 页码 12493-12505

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc04461j

关键词

-

资金

  1. JST CREST from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) [JPMJCR18J2]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [JP18H03875, JP19H05321, JP19H02579]
  3. Nanotechnology Platform of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction and control of 2D layered molecular packing motifs with functionally substituted pi-electron cores are crucial for developing organic electronic materials and devices. We investigated a regioisomeric structure-property relationship in high-performance and solution-processable layered organic semiconductors based on mono-octyl-substituted benzothieno[3,2-b]naphtho[2,3-b]thiophene (mono-C8-BTNT). We demonstrated that an isomorphous bilayer-type layered herringbone packing motif is obtainable in a series of four positional isomers of mono-C8-BTNTs whose pi-electron core is substituted by an octyl chain at one of the four most peripheral positions with roughly keeping the rod-like molecular shape. These regioisomeric compounds exhibited systematic variations in the solvent solubility and liquid-crystalline phase transitions at elevated temperatures. The analysis of intermolecular interaction energies in the crystals based on dispersion-corrected DFT calculations revealed that the crystals of 2- and 8-mono-C8-BTNTs are more stable than those of 3- and 9-mono-C8-BTNTs owing to the higher ordering of alkyl chain layers in the crystals. Such differences of the stability in their crystal formation are closely correlated with TFT performances, where the single-crystal devices of the 2- and 8-mono-C8-BTNTs substituted at the most peripheral positions exhibit high-performance TFT characteristics with a mobility of approximately 10 cm(2) V-1 s(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据