4.7 Article

State-of-Health Estimation and Remaining-Useful-Life Prediction for Lithium-Ion Battery Using a Hybrid Data-Driven Method

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 69, 期 10, 页码 10854-10867

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3014932

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; state-of-health (SOH); remaining-useful-life (RUL); hybrid ensemble learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51907163]
  2. Nanyang Assistant Professorship from Nanyang Technological University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries have been widely applied in industrial applications. It is desired to predict the health state of batteries to achieve optimal operation and health management. However, accuracy is the biggest bottleneck for battery health prediction. In this paper, a new hybrid ensemble data-driven method is proposed to accurately predict the state-of-health (SOH) and remaining-useful-life (RUL) of Li-ion batteries. A health indicator is selected as feature inputs to predict the degradation trend of battery, after the Pearson correlation analysis. Two random learning algorithms are integrated to extract the inherent relationship between the extracted health indicator and practical SOH due to their good learning performance. Based on the estimated SOH, the nonlinear autoregressive (NAR) structure is designed to reduce the RUL prediction error of each learning model since the NAR structure makes good use of historical and current information. Finally, in order to quantitatively evaluate the prediction interval of the RUL, a Bootstrap-based uncertainty management method is designed. Test results on two publicly available datasets show that the proposed hybrid data-driven method can accurately predict the SOH and RUL of batteries. The proposed method does not require any other additional hardware or system downtime, which makes it suitable for online practical applications, such as energy storage systems and electric vehicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据