4.7 Article

Secure MIMO-SVD Communications Against Eavesdroppers With Any Number of Antennas

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 69, 期 10, 页码 11077-11089

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3007430

关键词

6 g vehicle network; colluding eavesdroppers; mimo secure communication; multi-antenna eavesdropper; physical layer security; vehicle-to-everything communications

资金

  1. NSFC [61901089]
  2. National major RD Program [2018YFB0904900, 2018YFB0904905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physical layer security (PLS) provides strong and lightweight secure communications for vehicle networks, which has attracted great attention. However, current schemes cannot defend against the passive eavesdroppers with any number of antennas. To fill this gap, we propose a physical layer secure MIMO-SVD (singular value decomposition) communication scheme (SSVD) to defend against such an eavesdropper with any number of antennas. In the SSVD scheme, the confidential information first goes through a special data frames secure process at the transmitter. After that, by integrating with SSVD precoding, the key information is attached and delivered in the combination of activated/non-activatedMIMO parallel sub-channels of the legitimate receiver through thewireless channel. Due to the uniqueness and independence of wireless channel, only the legitimate receiver can observe the key information and use it to decrypt (XOR) the confidential information step by step with an arbitrary low BER (bit error rate). However, for any other eavesdropper who suffers an independent channel from legitimate users, the eavesdropper cannot obtain any key information from the received signals, regardless of how many antennas he/she has. Consequently, the eavesdropper cannot decrypt any information about the confidential information. The SSVD security and reliability are theoretically analyzed, and the simulation and numerical results fully verified its validity and effectiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据