4.7 Article

Robust Depth-Based Person Re-Identification

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 2588-2603

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2675201

关键词

Person re-identification; depth information

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [6152211, 61573387, 61661130157, 61628212]
  2. RS-Newton Advanced Fellowship [NA150459]
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [S2013050014265]
  4. Guangdong Science and Technology Planning Project [2016A010102012]
  5. Guangdong Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals [2014TQ01X779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Person re-identification (re-id) aims to match people across non-overlapping camera views. So far the RGB-based appearance is widely used in most existing works. However, when people appeared in extreme illumination or changed clothes, the RGB appearance-based re-id methods tended to fail. To overcome this problem, we propose to exploit depth information to provide more invariant body shape and skeleton information regardless of illumination and color change. More specifically, we exploit depth voxel covariance descriptor and further propose a locally rotation invariant depth shape descriptor called Eigen-depth feature to describe pedestrian body shape. We prove that the distance between any two covariance matrices on the Riemannian manifold is equivalent to the Euclidean distance between the corresponding Eigen-depth features. Furthermore, we propose a kernelized implicit feature transfer scheme to estimate Eigen-depth feature implicitly from RGB image when depth information is not available. We find that combining the estimated depth features with RGB-based appearance features can sometimes help to better reduce visual ambiguities of appearance features caused by illumination and similar clothes. The effectiveness of our models was validated on publicly available depth pedestrian datasets as compared to related methods for re-id.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据