4.7 Article

Random-Walker-Based Collaborative Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2604290

关键词

Active learning (AL); hyperspectral image; image classification; random walkers; semisupervised learning (SSL)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61601179]
  2. National Natural Science Fund of China [61325007, 61520106001]
  3. Science and Technology Plan Projects Fund of Hunan Province [2015WK3001]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities from Hunan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Active learning (AL) and semisupervised learning (SSL) are both promising solutions to hyperspectral image classification. Given a few initial labeled samples, this work combines AL and SSL in a novel manner, aiming to obtain more manually labeled and pseudolabeled samples and use them together with the initial labeled samples to improve the classification performance. First, based on a comparison of the segmentation and spectral-spatial classification results obtained by random walker (RW) and extended RW(ERW) algorithms, the unlabeled samples are separated into two different sets, i.e., low-and high-confidence unlabeled data sets. For the high-confidence unlabeled data, pseudolabeling is performed, which can ensure the correctness and informativeness of the pseudolabeled samples. For the low-confidence unlabeled data, AL is used to select samples. In this way, the samples which are more effective for improvement of classification performance can be labeled in only a few iterations. Finally, with the learned training set and the original hyperspectral image as inputs, the ERW classifier is used to obtain the final classification result. Experiments performed on three real hyperspectral data sets show that the proposed method can achieve competitive classification accuracy even with a very limited number of manually labeled samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据