4.7 Article

An Adaptive Weighted Tensor Completion Method for the Recovery of Remote Sensing Images With Missing Data

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2670021

关键词

Adaptive weighted; missing data reconstruction; remote sensing; tensor completion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0501403, 2016YFC0200903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41401383, 41422108]
  3. HKRGC [GRF 12302715, 12306616, CRF C1007-15G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Missing information, such as dead pixel values and cloud effects, is very common image quality degradation problems in remote sensing. Missing information can reduce the accuracy of the subsequent image processing, in applications such as classification, unmixing, and target detection, and even the quantitative retrieval process. The main aim of this paper is to study an adaptive weighted tensor completion (AWTC) method for the recovery of remote sensing images with missing data. Our idea is to collectively make use of the spatial, spectral, and temporal information to build a new weighted tensor low-rank regularization model for recovering the missing data. In the model, the weights are determined adaptively by considering the contribution of the spatial, spectral, and temporal information in each dimension. Experimental results based on both simulated and real data sets are presented to verify that the proposed method can recover missing data, and its performance is found to be better than the other tested methods. In the simulated experiments, the peak signal-to-noise ratio is improved by more than 3 dB, compared with the original tensor completion model. In the real data experiments, the proposed AWTC model can better recover the dead line problem in Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer band 6 and the scan-line corrector-off problem in enhanced thematic mapper plus images, with the smallest spectral distortion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据