4.7 Article

Hyperspectral Image Classification With Canonical Correlation Forests

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2607755

关键词

Canonical correlation forests (CCF); classification; ensemble learning; hyperspectral image

资金

  1. KAKENHI [24360347]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science through KAKENHI [16F16053]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K20955, 16H04587, 16F16053] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple classifier systems or ensemble learning is an effective tool for providing accurate classification results of hyperspectral remote sensing images. Two well-known ensemble learning classifiers for hyperspectral data are random forest (RF) and rotation forest (RoF). In this paper, we proposed to use a novel decision tree (DT) ensemble method, namely, canonical correlation forest (CCF). More specifically, several individual canonical correlation trees (CCTs) that are binary DTs, which use canonical correlation components for the hyperplane splitting, are used to construct the CCF. Additionally, we adopt the projection bootstrap technique in CCF, in which the full spectral bands are retained for split selection in the projected space. The techniques aforementioned allow the CCF to improve the accuracy of member classifiers and diversity within the ensemble. Furthermore, the CCF is extended to the spectral-spatial frameworks that incorporate Markov random fields, extended multiattribute profiles (EMAPs), and the ensemble of independent component analysis and rolling guidance filter (E-ICA-RGF). Experimental results on six hyperspectral data sets are used to indicate the comparative effectiveness of the proposed method, in terms of accuracy and computational complexity, compared with RF and RoF, and it turns out that CCF is a promising approach for hyperspectral image classification not only with spectral information but also in the spectral-spatial frameworks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据