4.7 Article

Influence of different factors on biofilm formation of Listeria monocytogenes and the regulation of cheY gene

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109405

关键词

Listeria monocytogenes; Biofilm, environmental factors; Cell properties; Chemotaxis gene cheY

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1602500]
  2. Agricultural Independent Innovation Program in Jiangsu Province [CX (18)3053]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a food-processing environment, bacterial cells often adhere to surfaces and form biofilms to protect themselves from external adverse influences. Our study aimed to identify the influence of environmental factors and cell properties on Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. Biofilm formation was quantified through measuring the optical density at 590 nm (OD590 nm) after crystal violet staining. Neutral pH and 37oC were beneficial for biofilm formation whereas the influence of glucose (0.0-1.0%) and sodium chloride (0.0-1.0%) were straindependent. In general, the addition of sodium chloride and glucose increased biofilm formation in most strains compared to that in controls with no sodium chloride or glucose added. Bacteria with strong biofilm-forming capacity always produced large amounts of biofilm in most instances. Biofilm formation positively correlated with the cell surface hydrophobicity and motility but was independent from planktonic cell growth. The expression of flagella-related flaA, motB, and the two-component chemotactic system cheA/Y genes in biofilm cells increased compared to that in planktonic cells. Meanwhile, a cheY knockout mutant was constructed, and decreased biofilm-formation ability along with reduced cell-surface hydrophobicity were found in the non-motile mutant. Furthermore, the cheY knockout mutant showed no change in growth, and pH susceptibility compared to that in the wild-type strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据